Reflections On The Modernization Of Clothing Enterprises From The Perspective Of Gome Case

News background

Bubbling with excitement

Gome may not be universal, but it is China.

Watching the fire from the shore is a reflection and reference.

After the pition to a modern company, does the direction of enterprise development follow the founders' vision or the board's wishes? Where is the bottom line that professional managers should abide by? The founder, manager and brand of a company are Trinity. When the founder and manager dispute, the most serious injury is brand.

Wong Kwong Yu is regarded as a hero of the grass. Although Chen Xiao has made immortal deeds, he can not escape the suspicion of usurping power. If he is right or wrong, he will fail. This drama is still on the ups and downs.

In China, because of the restriction of concept, family business is equivalent to backward management mode for a long time, so it is called private enterprise more.

In fact, in the world, family business is a very important form of enterprise organization.

Especially for clothing and other fully market-oriented industries, it is the large and small family businesses that promote the healthy development of the industry.

The dispute between Wong Kwong Yu and Chen Xiao has also aroused heated debate among the industry.

This reporter interviewed representatives of industry associations, enterprises and managers for the first time, presenting the views of all parties one by one.

The Gome incident is full of disputes between major shareholders and minority shareholders, disputes between founding shareholders and financial investors, disputes between major shareholders and management, and many small shareholders and other institutional investors.

However, the most subtle and obvious point is that Wong Kwong Yu and Chen Xiaozhi contend.

Should sigh Wong Kwong Yu greedy lead to tragedy, or should we rebuke Chen Xiao to embarrass world managers?

Focus one

Does the dispute between the boss and the manager affect the brand? What is the value of the manager?

Liu Yunqiang, chairman of Hunan Qingzang Garments Co., Ltd.

This incident will more or less affect the brand of Gome.

I personally believe that family businesses must remain in control no matter how they are pformed, otherwise they will be caught off guard if there is an accident.

Equity is too important to have no right to speak without holding shares.

The question of who should be subordinated to the founders and managers depends on the specific problems.

I think there is no absolute obedience. The standard of obedience depends on whether it can create benefits for the company.

If we can not create benefits for the company, what is the use of those who obey? Managers and enterprises can not be said to be simply a kind of employment relationship, but rather a relationship to enhance productivity. If we can not produce the effect of 1+1>2, what can we hire managers to do?

The value of professional managers is to create productive forces and expand productivity.

The goal of professional managers is to make the company develop better. This is a basic standard.

Jiang Guohao, vice president of global brand franchise center (GBF)

Wong Kwong Yu's dispute with Chen Xiao is just a game about rights. I don't think it will have much impact on the brand.

Professional managers should take morality as the first priority, and should respect the "once" boss with a tolerant heart.

After all, Wong Kwong Yu's ability to operate has been recognized by society. What he has met is just some setbacks.

Professional managers and bosses start with employment relationships and become partners after a long time.

Whether family business or not, the role of professional managers is the same, that is, using their own knowledge, experience and resources to make contributions to enterprises. This is also the position of professional managers in their own roles.