Home >

Lin Xiaoming: Why Not Give Micro-Blog Applause A Little Bit Of Applause?

2011/5/9 11:14:00 54

micro-blog

Jin Zhongyi, a director of the Zhejiang Haining Judicial Bureau, realized a small dream.

The Haining municipal government information disclosure network issued the notice on the opening of micro-blog official documents, and implemented micro-blog official documents in the judicial system of the whole city.

This initiative, known as the "opening up of the official document of the national government organization" by micro-blog, is a positive exploration, and its effectiveness needs time to be tested.

But what is unexpected is that this action has been criticized by many netizens. It is considered that the "show" is there, and that the "go through the motions" is also there, and the cynic is even more.

Why are so many netizens so dissatisfied with "micro-blog?"

Document

This naturally needs to be examined.

It can be said that this is due to some public power departments who have been keen to make a show, leaving people with memories that are difficult to eliminate.

As a result, when "micro-blog documents" and other exploratory measures came out, people looked at them with inertia.

The public's suspicion is natural, because many of the accomplice has finally met people's conjecture.

To solve this kind of distrust, it is necessary for Haining's judicial system to persist in the implementation of micro-blog's official documents and respond to queries with predictable results. Instead of being like some previous departments, the answer has been blowing in the wind and giving people the right initial doubt, so that this collective distrust can be found another footnote.

Micro-blog documents need to be adhered to, not only in form.

innovate

It also needs substantial content, otherwise it will fall into the "going through the motions" pattern.

If micro-blog's official documents can achieve substantive innovation from form to content, then not only can it save administrative costs, but also improve administrative efficiency. Why should we explore such a valuable search?

In this sense, such an innovation should not be the advocacy of personal interest, but a system. Such an exploration is not too much, but too little.

Questioning the criticism, Haining's judicial system has to be "sitting tight" and should change its perspective and mentality to listen.

We need to understand that good criticism is the greatest care.

Even if the criticism is harsh, it is necessary to draw nourishment from it, and "to change it, not to increase it", so as to perfect the new system design.

The reason is very good. People will also criticize and prove that others are concerned and deserve to be expected.

Criticism can be likened to the hedgehog overwintering. It is too tight to stab each other, but it is too cold to feel too far away.

Sorrow is greater than death. When we are completely silent because of disappointment, that is the loneliness that can not be said.

I remember that when we condemned the black whistle of Chinese football match, there were fans who said: "we still go to the ball, but we do not speak."

In this way, it is only proved that most of the victims are silent, and such scenes are unimaginable.

If there is no such thing as a vague mind, it will appear as a horrible and sad scene mentioned by the fans.

"No tolerance for others, but no tolerance for others."

For netizens, even if there is doubt, there is no need to rush to negate. Instead, we should give some time to see how it works.

When the new initiatives just sprout, they can be scolded back to their original form. Can they expect the departments concerned to change their style of work?

Therefore, let us first give micro-blog applause and expectation.